Personal Philosophy of Leadership FULL-TEXT FREE


This essay was delivered to Termika Stone from Louisville, Kentucky. Beware of this fraudulent person!

Personal Philosophy of leadership

Project managers, presidents, and supervisors are leaders. The most prominent quality they all have to poses is excellent leadership skills.  They tend to lead the masses to a common direction with the main aim of accomplishing the set organization objectives and goals. It is the duty of the leader to find the problem then find suitable solutions for the problem. The leader has the power to attract people through sharing and preaching his perspective to solving a given problem. Nonetheless, people tend to get together and share a common purpose when faced by a common problem. Example, in the case of a natural disaster, commuter’s accident or a presidential election, people will come together in masses to help. Here, they will unite and create a strong force against an individual they perceive to be a common enemy. With this understanding, this report accurately presents a discussion on personal philosophy of leadership.

Personal Philosophy of Leadership

 It is the natural instinct or intuition for us as humans to get together during hard times and in these situations an individual leadership quality can be observed. With all people on the same level, it is the duty of the leaders to organize people into groups that focus on tasks. For the leaders will keep an eye on everyone and each selected committee (Daresh, 2006). The leaders have to make sure that everybody is doing what he is should be working on, and he should take advantage of maximizing all individuals’ skills in order to get the job done. A leader needs to be on his feet in case of a problem arising and have a solution at hand. This will help in reacting swiftly and efficiently to provide a solution to the problem.

As a leader, his followers expect him to have a solution to all their problems. Example; in a discussion among two committees who are dealing with a task, it is the duty of the leader to determine what the problem is and provide a solution to the problem by assigning someone the task to accomplish the set task (Fauquier, 2006). This description of a leader describes the positional leadership. The leaders who can be recognized to do this job are presidents and leaders in companies who hold position titles. Throughout this paper, we will look in detail at personal philosophy of leadership how it can be applied.

In any form of leadership, a philosophy shall be appropriate since it guarantees the best of engagement and performance. This can also be found in teaching. Leadership philosophy can is useful in aiding people see themselves as being adequate and capable leaders, and this can as well be represented from their own different views (Bell, 2006). In that sense, they shall apply such an understanding towards the realization of their own goals.  While leadership can be termed to be the quality pertaining to the overseer where we have the person or leader leading people to the right direction, objectives and goals shall also have to be accomplished within the shortest time and with ease and as well peacefully.

Most of effective leaders tend to be the ones who remain extremely ethical and as well being an individual of principles (Daresh, 2006). So as, to qualify, or to be considered of being an outstanding leader, there are some significant factors which should be put into the greatest of consideration. Such factors will be able to define who a true leader should be, and will rely entirely on what one believes, and what shall be able to help in shaping the realities of becoming a leader. For example, should a leader believe that he is the personnel in the organization, and then his responsibility should be able to influence all other people in the business?

Current Sphere of Influence

To begin with, I clearly do believe strongly that the idea that the concept of leadership is something which in itself a journey which consists of a group of followers as well as leaders. The implication from this understanding is that, leadership should not be addressed as a personal goal or issue. Thus, for a leader to be quite effective, it would be required that there is coordination on the leader as well as on those following him, and this shall ease the burden when it comes to work. Since leadership comes with timeless service, it should be strong enough to implementing appropriate collaboration in service (Bell, 2006).

The use of informal, formal, positive, and negative power applied to personal philosophy

Formal personal power refers to the power of position mostly held by managers and individual holders of those positions need to develop coherent principles of handling the juniors. The managers with formal power can develop strategic policies that can help improve the performance of the members. Individuals with formal personal power need to understand ethics and work towards accepting opinion of others tom foster democracy and transparency. Informal person power on the other hand refers to the collective responsibilities of caring and concerned with others. Individuals in the positions of personal power use the opportunity to improve the state of things in a societal set up.

Positive power is based on strength and competence that individuals acquire with maturity in time. Positivism leads to self-realization, competence, vision other positive qualities. Negative power bases on the elements of passiveness and manifests through behaviors that indicate weakness, incompetence and self destructive. The mode of controlling negative power depicts failure of accepting power over individual’s life and manifests through childlike machinations like isolation, tantrums and other self destructive behaviors.

More so, a leader, as I do believe, one’s powers should be able to motivate, inspire, and as well empower others towards successful goals. On the other hand, the leader will not be able to achieve goals when there is no goal orientation, and hence my philosophy should be able to include such an orientation. With my philosophy, I also think it is necessarily beneficial to balance work and the personal success. Good leadership should be based on appropriate planning and adequate balancing on the work so that the amount of work to be done should rhyme with ones capability, and this shall ensure that everything shall run smoothly (Bell, 2006). With any form of connection towards balancing one’s work, it would be possible to have appropriate success, and thus he or she should be ready to act as a role model.

Another thing is in helping the people so that they can be able to find and invent the truly best within themselves. It would be of immense importance for all people to understand that, all moves in leadership should come up with qualities so that positional titles should be achieved through hard work and the best of engagement. One’s reflection on leadership philosophy should be of the best implications to others. This should involve an adequate understanding on what forms of assumptions, which have the capability of improving one’s leadership and thinking in the organization (Bell, 2006). More often than not, majority of leaders tend to be unaware of some vital assumptions and thus should be willing to address all forms of challenges which might be faced. Such reflection of one’s leadership should be excellently adopted to uncover some of the major assumptions in any organization.


Another part of my leadership philosophy is in engaging in integrity and professional enhancement or development. When one is a leader, the values or attributes should be adopted in guiding one’s intentions also influencing how others might be lead, and as well unleash new values within the management and leadership process (Daresh, 2006). Respect on leadership from all different perspectives is another fundamental principle of leadership. It makes sure other are bind by some respect, and finally, ensuring that there has been gratitude and respect on all those below me in the leadership hierarchy.


Bell, A. (2006). Great leadership: what it is and what it takes in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Daresh, C. (2006). Supervision as a Proactive Leadership. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Fauquier, R. (2006). Personal Leadership Philosophy: Guidance. Retrieved on 14th November 2011 from

Moore, T. (2010). Philosophy of Education: an introduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.